In this viewpoint Michael D. Shaw uses history, facts, and examples to make his argument that the United States does not need recycling laws. He does not, however, use any quotations to support his point. If you were to rewrite this article and insert quotations, what authorities might you quote from? Where would you place these quotations to bolster the points Shaw makes?
The Government Should Lead Efforts to Recycle Electronics u.S. Government Accountability Office
The following viewpoint was published by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, an agency that investigates how the federal government spends taxpayer dollars. The authors argue that in order to be effective, electronics recycling programs should be required and supported by the federal government. They explain why nongovernmental recycling programs do not work: Consumers have to pay a fee to recycle their electronics and are forced to drop them at inconvenient locations. Since electronics are not banned from landfills in forty-six states, many people instead choose to throw their electronics in landfills instead of recycling them (which the authors say is much better for the environment). However, programs that are sponsored by the federal government are highly successful. Only the government has the resources and manpower to make electronics recycling financially and environmentally feasible. Therefore, the authors conclude the government should strengthen its role as a leader in electronics recycling.
Electronic Waste: Strengthening the Role of the Federal Government in Encouraging Recycling and Reuse, Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2005.
authority to require recycling of these products . . . these programs' successes have been and will continue to be limited.
Was this article helpful?